How to Conduct a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) with PRISMA
Have you ever felt like drowning in an ocean of journals while trying to conduct a literature review? Reading hundreds of articles without clear direction, confused about which ones are relevant, and ultimately producing an unsystematic review? If so, you need a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) with the PRISMA protocol. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) is an international standard adopted by over 90% of Q1 journals to ensure your review is transparent, reproducible, and bias-free. This article guides you through the 4 main phases of PRISMA 2020, from identification to inclusion, complete with a ready-to-use flow diagram template. If you need help drafting your SLR protocol or want your review completed faster with maximum quality, the Corvexum team is ready to be your strategic partner.
What is PRISMA and Why Does It Matter?
PRISMA is a guideline consisting of 27 checklist items and a flow diagram that helps researchers report systematic reviews comprehensively and transparently. The latest version, PRISMA 2020, updates the 2009 version with additions:
- Items 16a-16d: More detailed reporting of search results and study selection
- Item 20: Transparency in handling missing data
- Item 24: Protocol registration (e.g., in PROSPERO) to avoid duplication bias
Why does this matter? Reputable journals like The Lancet, BMJ, and Nature require PRISMA compliance as a publication condition. Without PRISMA, your review risks rejection at the initial screening stage.
Phase 1: Identification
The first stage is collecting all potential articles from various databases. The steps are:
- Define databases: Minimum 2-3 major databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, IEEE Xplore, or ProQuest depending on your field.
- Create search string: Use combinations of Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT) with relevant keywords. Example:
("machine learning" OR "deep learning") AND ("healthcare" OR "medical") AND "diagnosis" - Document results: Record the number of articles from each database, search dates, and the search strings used.
- Remove duplicates: Use Mendeley, Zotero, or the deduplication feature in Rayyan.
Pro Tip: Save the search history from each database. This is crucial for reproducibility and will be requested by journal reviewers.
Phase 2: Screening
After removing duplicates, it’s time to screen articles based on title and abstract:
- Create clear inclusion/exclusion criteria before starting screening. Example criteria: publication year (2015-2026), language (English only), article type (peer-reviewed journal), study population.
- Use collaborative tools: Rayyan (free, suitable for teams), Covidence (paid, full features), or systematic review tools in Mendeley.
- Conduct independent screening: If working in a team, at least 2 reviewers must assess each article independently, then discuss disagreements.
- Record exclusion reasons: Every rejected article must have a specific reason (not just “not relevant”).
Phase 3: Eligibility
Articles that pass title/abstract screening are then read in full text for eligibility assessment:
- Read full text carefully: Focus on methodology, population, intervention, and outcomes that align with your research question.
- Use PICOS framework: Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Study design to assess suitability.
- Quality assessment: Use tools such as Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (for observational studies), Cochrane Risk of Bias (for RCTs), or JBI Critical Appraisal Tools.
- Document all decisions: Every article excluded at this stage must be recorded with its reason.
Phase 4: Included
Articles that pass all previous stages enter the final included studies:
- Data extraction: Create a spreadsheet with columns: author, year, title, country, methodology, sample, main findings, limitations.
- Synthesize findings: This can be narrative synthesis (for heterogeneous data) or meta-analysis (for homogeneous data with combinable effect sizes).
- Identify research gaps: From emerging patterns, determine areas that haven’t been widely studied.
- Write results: Follow the PRISMA checklist structure to ensure no item is missed.
🚀 Is Your SLR Stuck? Let Us Execute It!
A quality Systematic Literature Review takes 3-6 months if done alone, not to mention the risks of bias and methodological errors that could get your review rejected by journals. The Corvexum team, which has handled 200+ SLRs across various fields, is ready to help you:
- ✅ SLR protocol drafting + PROSPERO registration
- ✅ Search strategy with optimized Boolean operators
- ✅ Screening & quality assessment by 2 independent reviewers
- ✅ PRISMA flow diagram + complete 27-item checklist
- ✅ Narrative synthesis or meta-analysis with RevMan/Stata
Or email: corvexum@gmail.com | Visit: corvexum.com
Tinggalkan Balasan